↓ Skip to main content

Eliminating Plasmodium falciparum in Hainan, China: a study on the use of behavioural change communication intervention to promote malaria prevention in mountain worker populations

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eliminating Plasmodium falciparum in Hainan, China: a study on the use of behavioural change communication intervention to promote malaria prevention in mountain worker populations
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang-hua He, Xi-min Hu, Guang-ze Wang, Wei Zhao, Ding-wei Sun, Yu-chun Li, Chun-xiang Chen, Jian-wei Du, Shan-qing Wang

Abstract

In the island of Hainan, the great majority of malaria cases occur in mountain worker populations. Using the behavioral change communication (BCC) strategy, an interventional study was conducted to promote mountain worker malaria prevention at a test site. This study found the methods and measures that are suitable for malaria prevention among mountain worker populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,444,781
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,444
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,076
of 226,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#46
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.