↓ Skip to main content

Partner relationship satisfaction and maternal emotional distress in early pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partner relationship satisfaction and maternal emotional distress in early pregnancy
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gun-Mette B Røsand, Kari Slinning, Malin Eberhard-Gran, Espen Røysamb, Kristian Tambs

Abstract

Recognition of maternal emotional distress during pregnancy and the identification of risk factors for this distress are of considerable clinical- and public health importance. The mental health of the mother is important both for herself, and for the physical and psychological health of her children and the welfare of the family. The first aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for maternal emotional distress during pregnancy with special focus on partner relationship satisfaction. The second aim was to assess interaction effects between relationship satisfaction and the main predictors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,165,373
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,445
of 14,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,604
of 108,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#23
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.