↓ Skip to main content

Moving in extreme environments: open water swimming in cold and warm water

Overview of attention for article published in Extreme Physiology & Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moving in extreme environments: open water swimming in cold and warm water
Published in
Extreme Physiology & Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-7648-3-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Tipton, Carl Bradford

Abstract

Open water swimming (OWS), either 'wild' such as river swimming or competitive, is a fast growing pastime as well as a part of events such as triathlons. Little evidence is available on which to base high and low water temperature limits. Also, due to factors such as acclimatisation, which disassociates thermal sensation and comfort from thermal state, individuals cannot be left to monitor their own physical condition during swims. Deaths have occurred during OWS; these have been due to not only thermal responses but also cardiac problems. This paper, which is part of a series on 'Moving in Extreme Environments', briefly reviews current understanding in pertinent topics associated with OWS. Guidelines are presented for the organisation of open water events to minimise risk, and it is concluded that more information on the responses to immersion in cold and warm water, the causes of the individual variation in these responses and the precursors to the cardiac events that appear to be the primary cause of death in OWS events will help make this enjoyable sport even safer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 19%
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 76 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 37 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 497. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#51,665
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#3
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339
of 235,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.