↓ Skip to main content

Moderating effects of sex on the impact of diagnosis and amyloid positivity on verbal memory and hippocampal volume

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moderating effects of sex on the impact of diagnosis and amyloid positivity on verbal memory and hippocampal volume
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13195-017-0300-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Z. K. Caldwell, Jody-Lynn Berg, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Sarah J. Banks, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) impacts men and women differently, but the effect of sex on predementia stages is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine whether sex moderates the impact of florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid positivity (A(+)) on verbal learning and memory performance and hippocampal volume (HV) in normal cognition (NC) and early mild cognitive impairment (eMCI). Seven hundred forty-two participants with NC and participants with eMCI from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (second cohort [ADNI2] and Grand Opportunity Cohort [ADNI-GO]) were included. All had baseline florbetapir PET measured, and 526 had screening visit HV measured. Regression moderation models were used to examine whether A(+) effects on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test learning and delayed recall and right and left HV (adjusted for total intracranial volume) were moderated by diagnosis and sex. Age, cognition at screening, education, and apolipoprotein E ε4 carrier status were controlled. Women with A(+), but not those with florbetapir PET amyloid negative (A-),eMCI showed poorer learning. For women with NC, there was no relationship of A(+) with learning. In contrast, A(+) men trended toward poorer learning regardless of diagnosis. A similar trend was found for verbal delayed recall: Women with A(+), but not A-, eMCI trended toward reduced delayed recall; no effects were observed for women with NC or for men. Hippocampal analyses indicated that women with A(+), but not those with A(-), eMCI, trended toward smaller right HV; no significant A(+) effects were observed for women with NC. Men showed similar, though nonsignificant, patterns of smaller right HV in A(+) eMCI, but not in men with A(-) eMCI or NC. No interactive effects of sex were noted for left HV. Women with NC showed verbal learning and memory scores robust to A(+), and women with A(+) eMCI lost this advantage. In contrast, A(+) impacted men's scores less significantly or not at all, and comparably across those with NC and eMCI. Sex marginally moderated the relationship of A(+) and diagnosis with right HV, such that women with NC showed no A(+) effect and women with A(+) eMCI lost that advantage in neural integrity; the pattern in men was less clear. These findings show that women with A(+) eMCI (i.e., prodromal AD) have differential neural and cognitive decline, which has implications for considering sex in early detection of AD and development of therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 34 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Neuroscience 12 13%
Psychology 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 38 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,363,636
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#1,105
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,753
of 315,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.