↓ Skip to main content

A theory-based online health behaviour intervention for new university students (U@Uni): results from a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A theory-based online health behaviour intervention for new university students (U@Uni): results from a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy Epton, Paul Norman, Aba-Sah Dadzie, Peter R Harris, Thomas L Webb, Paschal Sheeran, Steven A Julious, Fabio Ciravegna, Alan Brennan, Petra S Meier, Declan Naughton, Andrea Petroczi, Jen Kruger, Iltaf Shah

Abstract

Too few young people engage in behaviours that reduce the risk of morbidity and premature mortality, such as eating healthily, being physically active, drinking sensibly and not smoking. This study sought to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a theory-based online health behaviour intervention (based on self-affirmation theory, the Theory of Planned Behaviour and implementation intentions) targeting these behaviours in new university students, in comparison to a measurement-only control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 254 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 75 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Sports and Recreations 13 5%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 82 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,200,017
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,492
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,358
of 228,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#47
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.