↓ Skip to main content

Commensal Streptococcus agalactiaeisolated from patients seen at University Hospital of Londrina, Paraná, Brazil: capsular types, genotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence determinants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commensal Streptococcus agalactiaeisolated from patients seen at University Hospital of Londrina, Paraná, Brazil: capsular types, genotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence determinants
Published in
BMC Microbiology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-13-297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliane Saori Otaguiri, Ana Elisa Belotto Morguette, Eliandro Reis Tavares, Pollyanna Myrella Capela dos Santos, Alexandre Tadachi Morey, Juscélio Donizete Cardoso, Márcia Regina Eches Perugini, Lucy Megumi Yamauchi, Sueli Fumie Yamada-Ogatta

Abstract

Streptococcus agalactiae or Group B Streptococci (GBS) have the ability to access various host sites, which reflects its adaptability to different environments during the course of infection. This adaptation is due to the expression of virulence factors that are involved with survival, invasion and bacterial persistence in the host. This study aimed to characterize GBS isolates from women of reproductive age seen at University Hospital of Londrina, according to capsular typing, genetic relatedness, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and occurrence of virulence determinants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 26 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,761
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,405
of 306,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#38
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.