You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Glycoprotein composition along the pistil of Malus x domestica and the modulation of pollen tube growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-14-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan M Losada, Maria Herrero |
Abstract |
The characteristics of pollen tube growth are not constant, but display distinct patterns of growth within the different tissues of the pistil. In the stigma, the growth rate is slow and autotrophic, whereas in the style, it is rapid and heterotrophic. Very little is known about the interactions between these distinct maternal tissues and the traversing pollen tube and the role of this interaction on the observed metabolism. In this work we characterise pollen tube growth in the apple flower and look for differences in glycoprotein epitope localization between two different maternal tissues, the stigma and the style. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 68% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Design | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,678,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#209
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,284
of 318,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#7
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.