↓ Skip to main content

Targeted Chromatin Capture (T2C): a novel high resolution high throughput method to detect genomic interactions and regulatory elements

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeted Chromatin Capture (T2C): a novel high resolution high throughput method to detect genomic interactions and regulatory elements
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-8935-7-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petros Kolovos, Harmen JG van de Werken, Nick Kepper, Jessica Zuin, Rutger WW Brouwer, Christel EM Kockx, Kerstin S Wendt, Wilfred FJ van IJcken, Frank Grosveld, Tobias A Knoch

Abstract

Significant efforts have recently been put into the investigation of the spatial organization and the chromatin-interaction networks of genomes. Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technology and its derivatives are important tools used in this effort. However, many of these have limitations, such as being limited to one viewpoint, expensive with moderate to low resolution, and/or requiring a large sequencing effort. Techniques like Hi-C provide a genome-wide analysis. However, it requires massive sequencing effort with considerable costs. Here we describe a new technique termed Targeted Chromatin Capture (T2C), to interrogate large selected regions of the genome. T2C provides an unbiased view of the spatial organization of selected loci at superior resolution (single restriction fragment resolution, from 2 to 6 kbp) at much lower costs than Hi-C due to the lower sequencing effort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 192 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 27%
Researcher 51 25%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 16 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 77 37%
Computer Science 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 21 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,779,837
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#184
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,266
of 212,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them