↓ Skip to main content

Video Q

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Video Q&A: Patients leading the direction of clinical research - an interview with Paul Wicks
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0118-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Wicks

Abstract

In this video Q&A, we talk to Paul Wicks about the emergence of participant-led research, and discuss how this field may be expected to develop in the near future, particularly with regard to personalized medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Master 6 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Psychology 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,259,780
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,217
of 3,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,371
of 234,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#40
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.