You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Video Q&A: Patients leading the direction of clinical research - an interview with Paul Wicks
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-014-0118-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul Wicks |
Abstract |
In this video Q&A, we talk to Paul Wicks about the emergence of participant-led research, and discuss how this field may be expected to develop in the near future, particularly with regard to personalized medicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Austria | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
Researcher | 6 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
Psychology | 3 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,259,780
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,217
of 3,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,371
of 234,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#40
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.