↓ Skip to main content

Direct association between pharyngeal viral secretion and host cytokine response in severe pandemic influenza

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct association between pharyngeal viral secretion and host cytokine response in severe pandemic influenza
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-11-232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel Almansa, Andres Anton, Paula Ramirez, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, David Banner, Tomás Pumarola, Luoling Xu, Jesús Blanco, Longsi Ran, Guillermo Lopez-Campos, Fernando Martin-Sanchez, Lorenzo Socias, Ana Loza, David Andaluz, Enrique Maravi, Mónica Gordón, Maria C Gallegos, Victoria Fernandez, Cristobal León, Pedro Merino, Maria Ángeles Marcos, Francisco Gandía, Felipe Bobillo, Salvador Resino, Jose Mª Eiros, Carmen Castro, Paula Mateo, Milagros Gonzalez-Rivera, Jordi Rello, Raul Ortiz de Lejarazu, David J Kelvin, Jesus F Bermejo-Martin

Abstract

Severe disease caused by 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1virus is characterized by the presence of hypercytokinemia. The origin of the exacerbated cytokine response is unclear. As observed previously, uncontrolled influenza virus replication could strongly influence cytokine production. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between host cytokine responses and viral levels in pandemic influenza critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2011.
All research outputs
#17,646,807
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,057
of 7,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,199
of 124,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#49
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.