↓ Skip to main content

A pilot controlled trial of a combination of dense cranial electroacupuncture stimulation and body acupuncture for post-stroke depression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pilot controlled trial of a combination of dense cranial electroacupuncture stimulation and body acupuncture for post-stroke depression
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sui-Cheung Man, Ben H B Hung, Roger M K Ng, Xiao-Chun Yu, Hobby Cheung, Mandy P M Fung, Leonard S W Li, Kwok-Pui Leung, Kei-Pui Leung, Kevin W Y Tsang, Eric Ziea, Vivian T Wong, Zhang-Jin Zhang

Abstract

Our previous studies have demonstrated the treatment benefits of dense cranial electroacupuncture stimulation (DCEAS), a novel brain stimulation therapy in patients with major depression, postpartum depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The purpose of the present study was to further evaluate the effectiveness of DCEAS combined with body acupuncture and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in patients with post-stroke depression (PSD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 256 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 33%
Student > Master 21 8%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Psychology 21 8%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 74 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#13,857,542
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,535
of 3,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,455
of 230,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#40
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.