↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular matrix signatures of human primary metastatic colon cancers and their metastases to liver

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
5 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular matrix signatures of human primary metastatic colon cancers and their metastases to liver
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Naba, Karl R Clauser, Charles A Whittaker, Steven A Carr, Kenneth K Tanabe, Richard O Hynes

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Despite the fact that tumor cell-intrinsic mechanisms controlling colorectal carcinogenesis have been identified, novel prognostic and diagnostic tools as well as novel therapeutic strategies are still needed to monitor and target colon cancer progression. We and others have previously shown, using mouse models, that the extracellular matrix (ECM), a major component of the tumor microenvironment, is an important contributor to tumor progression. In order to identify candidate biomarkers, we sought to define ECM signatures of metastatic colorectal cancers and their metastases to the liver.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 192 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 26%
Researcher 46 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Engineering 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 43 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,235,507
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#716
of 8,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,224
of 234,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#20
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.