You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automation of Workplace Lifting Hazard Assessment for Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2052-4374-26-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
June T Spector, Max Lieblich, Stephen Bao, Kevin McQuade, Margaret Hughes |
| Abstract |
Existing methods for practically evaluating musculoskeletal exposures such as posture and repetition in workplace settings have limitations. We aimed to automate the estimation of parameters in the revised United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lifting equation, a standard manual observational tool used to evaluate back injury risk related to lifting in workplace settings, using depth camera (Microsoft Kinect) and skeleton algorithm technology. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
#159
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,157
of 243,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.