You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Landscape determinants and remote sensing of anopheline mosquito larval habitats in the western Kenya highlands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-5-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emmanuel Mushinzimana, Stephen Munga, Noboru Minakawa, Li Li, Chen-chieh Feng, Ling Bian, Uriel Kitron, Cindy Schmidt, Louisa Beck, Guofa Zhou, Andrew K Githeko, Guiyun Yan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 123 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 34 | 24% |
Student > Master | 30 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 7 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,486,912
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,871
of 5,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,650
of 70,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.