↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous thrombin potential following hemostatic therapy with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: a 7-day observational study of trauma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endogenous thrombin potential following hemostatic therapy with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: a 7-day observational study of trauma patients
Published in
Critical Care, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc13982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Herbert Schöchl, Wolfgang Voelckel, Marc Maegele, Lukas Kirchmair, Christoph J Schlimp

Abstract

Purified prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is increasingly used as hemostatic therapy for trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). However, the impact of PCC administration on coagulation status among patients with TIC has not been adequately investigated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 29%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 76%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,610,242
of 21,343,037 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,616
of 5,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,856
of 208,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#44
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.