You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global temperature constraints on Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus persistence and competence for dengue virus transmission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-3305-7-338 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver J Brady, Nick Golding, David M Pigott, Moritz U G Kraemer, Jane P Messina, Robert C Reiner Jr, Thomas W Scott, David L Smith, Peter W Gething, Simon I Hay |
| Abstract |
Dengue is a disease that has undergone significant expansion over the past hundred years. Understanding what factors limit the distribution of transmission can be used to predict current and future limits to further dengue expansion. While not the only factor, temperature plays an important role in defining these limits. Previous attempts to analyse the effect of temperature on the geographic distribution of dengue have not considered its dynamic intra-annual and diurnal change and its cumulative effects on mosquito and virus populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 570 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 551 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 111 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 14% |
| Unknown | 115 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 157 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 101 | 18% |
| Unknown | 129 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,039,101
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#345
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,903
of 239,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#6
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.