You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus clinical trials: a review of content validity, face validity and psychometric performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-014-0116-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Holloway, Louise Humphrey, Louise Heron, Claire Pilling, Helen Kitchen, Lise Højbjerre, Martin Strandberg-Larsen, Brian Bekker Hansen |
| Abstract |
Despite overall progress in treatment of autoimmune diseases, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) experience many inflammatory symptoms representing an unmet medical need. This study aimed to create a conceptual model of the humanistic and economic burden of SLE, and review the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used to measure such concepts in SLE clinical trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 34% |
| Psychology | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,198,017
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,128
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,090
of 228,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.