↓ Skip to main content

A prospective study of the association of patient expectations with changes in health-related quality of life outcomes, following total joint replacement

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective study of the association of patient expectations with changes in health-related quality of life outcomes, following total joint replacement
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Gonzalez Saenz de Tejada, Antonio Escobar, Amaia Bilbao, Carmen Herrera-Espiñeira, Lidia García-Perez, Felipe Aizpuru, Cristina Sarasqueta

Abstract

Patient expectations regarding surgery may be related to outcomes in total joint replacement (TJR). The aim of this study was to determine the association of patient expectations with health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form 12 (SF-12) and satisfaction with current symptoms measured on a 4-point Likert scale, one year after surgery, adjusting for Body Mass Index (BMI), age, gender, joint, education, previous intervention and baseline scores.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Other 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 51 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#13,177,677
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,824
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,416
of 228,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#37
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.