↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic resistance: it’s bad, but why isn’t it worse?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
165 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic resistance: it’s bad, but why isn’t it worse?
Published in
BMC Biology, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12915-017-0423-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Waglechner, Gerard D. Wright

Abstract

Antibiotic natural products are ancient and so is resistance. Consequently, environmental bacteria harbor numerous and varied antibiotic resistance elements. Nevertheless, despite long histories of antibiotic production and exposure, environmental bacteria are not resistant to all known antibiotics. This means that there are barriers to the acquisition of a complete resistance armamentarium. The sources, distribution, and movement of resistance mechanisms in different microbes and bacterial populations are mosaic features that act as barriers to slow this movement, thus moderating the emergence of bacterial pan-resistance. This is highly relevant to understanding the emergence of resistance in pathogenic bacteria that can inform better antibiotic management practices and influence new drug discovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 410 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 66 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 16%
Researcher 55 13%
Student > Master 43 10%
Other 18 4%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 112 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 7%
Chemistry 16 4%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 125 30%