You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-017-0644-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa G. Liberati, Francesca Ruggiero, Laura Galuppo, Mara Gorli, Marien González-Lorenzo, Marco Maraldi, Pietro Ruggieri, Hernan Polo Friz, Giuseppe Scaratti, Koren H. Kwag, Roberto Vespignani, Lorenzo Moja |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 29% |
| United States | 8 | 14% |
| Australia | 6 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 25% |
| Scientists | 11 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 354 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 14% |
| Unknown | 125 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 19% |
| Unknown | 138 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,093,089
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#168
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,845
of 327,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.