↓ Skip to main content

Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome performed worse than controls in a controlled repeated exercise study despite a normal oxidative phosphorylation capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome performed worse than controls in a controlled repeated exercise study despite a normal oxidative phosphorylation capacity
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-8-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruud CW Vermeulen, Ruud M Kurk, Frans C Visser, Wim Sluiter, Hans R Scholte

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility that a decreased mitochondrial ATP synthesis causes muscular and mental fatigue and plays a role in the pathophysiology of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 11 8%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Sports and Recreations 9 6%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,640,589
of 26,248,133 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#309
of 4,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,470
of 111,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.