↓ Skip to main content

Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome performed worse than controls in a controlled repeated exercise study despite a normal oxidative phosphorylation capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome performed worse than controls in a controlled repeated exercise study despite a normal oxidative phosphorylation capacity
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-8-93
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruud CW Vermeulen, Ruud M Kurk, Frans C Visser, Wim Sluiter, Hans R Scholte

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility that a decreased mitochondrial ATP synthesis causes muscular and mental fatigue and plays a role in the pathophysiology of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Sports and Recreations 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 23 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,218,064
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#215
of 3,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,131
of 98,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.