↓ Skip to main content

Maternal near-miss and death and their association with caesarean section complications: a cross-sectional study at a university hospital and a regional hospital in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal near-miss and death and their association with caesarean section complications: a cross-sectional study at a university hospital and a regional hospital in Tanzania
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena Litorp, Hussein L Kidanto, Mattias Rööst, Muzdalifat Abeid, Lennarth Nyström, Birgitta Essén

Abstract

The maternal near-miss (MNM) concept has been developed to assess life-threatening conditions during pregnancy, childhood, and puerperium. In recent years, caesarean section (CS) rates have increased rapidly in many low- and middle-income countries, a trend which might have serious effects on maternal health. Our aim was to describe the occurrence and panorama of maternal near-miss and death in two low-resource settings, and explore their association with CS complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 28%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Lecturer 13 6%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 14%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Unspecified 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 55 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,715,377
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,559
of 4,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,613
of 228,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#70
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.