You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative analysis of information sharing for children with medical complexity within and across health care organizations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-283 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Quigley, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Sherri Adams, Charlotte Moore Hepburn, Eyal Cohen |
| Abstract |
Children with medical complexity (CMC) are characterized by substantial family-identified service needs, chronic and severe conditions, functional limitations, and high health care use. Information exchange is critically important in high quality care of complex patients at high risk for poor care coordination. Written care plans for CMC are an excellent test case for how well information sharing is currently occurring. The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers to and facilitators of information sharing for CMC across providers, care settings, and families. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,748,392
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,673
of 7,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,190
of 226,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#21
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.