You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A survey of factors influencing career preference in new-entrant and exiting medical students from four UK medical schools
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-151 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer A Cleland, Peter W Johnston, Micheal Anthony, Nadir Khan, Neil W Scott |
Abstract |
Workforce planning is a central issue for service provision and has consequences for medical education. Much work has been examined the career intentions, career preferences and career destinations of UK medical graduates but there is little published about medical students career intentions. How soon do medical students formulate careers intentions? How much do these intentions and preferences change during medical school? If they do change, what are the determining factors? Our aim was to compare medical students' career preferences upon entry into and exit from undergraduate medical degree programmes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 48% |
Canada | 5 | 22% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 43% |
Members of the public | 7 | 30% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Bahamas | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 186 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 19% |
Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
Researcher | 20 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 22% |
Unknown | 36 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 52% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
Psychology | 8 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 39 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,654,396
of 25,515,042 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#416
of 4,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,820
of 240,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#8
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,515,042 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.