You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microglia in mouse retina contralateral to experimental glaucoma exhibit multiple signs of activation in all retinal layers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-2094-11-133 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blanca Rojas, Beatriz I Gallego, Ana I Ramírez, Juan J Salazar, Rosa de Hoz, Francisco J Valiente-Soriano, Marcelino Avilés-Trigueros, Maria P Villegas-Perez, Manuel Vidal-Sanz, Alberto Triviño, José M Ramírez |
| Abstract |
Glaucomatous optic neuropathy, a leading cause of blindness, can progress despite control of intraocular pressure - currently the main risk factor and target for treatment. Glaucoma progression shares mechanisms with neurodegenerative disease, including microglia activation. In the present model of ocular hypertension (OHT), we have recently described morphological signs of retinal microglia activation and MHC-II upregulation in both the untreated contralateral eyes and OHT eyes. By using immunostaining, we sought to analyze and quantify additional signs of microglia activation and differences depending on the retinal layer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 30% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 29 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,941,088
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,148
of 2,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,445
of 229,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.