You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of a multi-ingredient dietary supplement on body composition, adipokines, blood lipids, and metabolic health in overweight and obese men and women: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-11-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J Ormsbee, Shweta R Rawal, Daniel A Baur, Amber W Kinsey, Marcus L Elam, Maria T Spicer, Nicholas T Fischer, Takudzwa A Madzima, D David Thomas |
| Abstract |
The present study investigated the effects of a multi-ingredient dietary supplement (MIDS) containing caffeine, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), green tea, and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) taken for 8 weeks on body composition, blood lipid profile, glucose, insulin, adiponectin, leptin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in overweight and obese men and women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,073,867
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#251
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,181
of 449,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#234
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.