You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cancer caregiving tasks and consequences and their associations with caregiver status and the caregiver’s relationship to the patient: a survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-541 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Line Lund, Lone Ross, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Mogens Groenvold |
Abstract |
Seriously ill patients often depend on their informal caregivers to help and support them through the disease course. This study investigated informal cancer caregivers' experiences of caregiving tasks and consequences and how caregiver status (primary vs. non-primary caregiver) and the caregiver's relationship to the patient (spouse/partner, etc.) are related to these experiences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 21% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 20% |
Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
Psychology | 20 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,156
of 8,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,456
of 231,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#88
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.