↓ Skip to main content

Tranexamic acid attenuates inflammatory response in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery through blockade of fibrinolysis: a case control study followed by a randomized double-blind controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tranexamic acid attenuates inflammatory response in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery through blockade of fibrinolysis: a case control study followed by a randomized double-blind controlled trial
Published in
Critical Care, January 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc6173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan J Jimenez, Jose L Iribarren, Leonardo Lorente, Jose M Rodriguez, Domingo Hernandez, Mohamed I Nassar, Rosalia Perez, Maitane Brouard, Antonio Milena, Rafael Martinez, Maria L Mora

Abstract

Extracorporeal circulation induces hemostatic alterations that lead to inflammatory response (IR) and postoperative bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TA) reduces fibrinolysis and blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, its effects on IR and vasoplegic shock (VS) are not well known and elucidating these effects was the main objective of this study.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 24%
Other 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 19 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,394,611
of 19,295,332 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,313
of 5,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,318
of 203,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,295,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.