↓ Skip to main content

GLUT3 is induced during epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes tumor cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer & Metabolism, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 204)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GLUT3 is induced during epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes tumor cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cancer & Metabolism, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-3002-2-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Masin, Jessica Vazquez, Simona Rossi, Svenja Groeneveld, Natasha Samson, Petra C Schwalie, Bart Deplancke, Laura E Frawley, Jérôme Gouttenoire, Darius Moradpour, Trudy G Oliver, Etienne Meylan

Abstract

Alterations in glucose metabolism and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) constitute two important characteristics of carcinoma progression toward invasive cancer. Despite an extensive characterization of each of them separately, the links between EMT and glucose metabolism of tumor cells remain elusive. Here we show that the neuronal glucose transporter GLUT3 contributes to glucose uptake and proliferation of lung tumor cells that have undergone an EMT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#794,994
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Cancer & Metabolism
#7
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,415
of 228,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer & Metabolism
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.