↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA-18a inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1α activity and lung metastasis in basal breast cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNA-18a inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1α activity and lung metastasis in basal breast cancers
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/bcr3693
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raisa Krutilina, Wenlin Sun, Aarti Sethuraman, Martin Brown, Tiffany N Seagroves, Lawrence M Pfeffer, Tatyana Ignatova, Meiyun Fan, Krutilina R, Sun W, Sethuraman A, Brown M, Seagroves TN, Pfeffer LM, Ignatova T, Fan M

Abstract

In breast cancer, distinct expression profiles of miRNAs (microRNAs) have been associated with molecular subgroups and clinicopathological characteristics, implicating a diagnostic and prognostic role of miRNAs. However, the biological functions of deregulated miRNAs in tumor progression are not completely defined. In this study, we investigated the function of miR-18a (microRNA-18a) in regulating breast cancer metastasis through the HIF1A (hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha) -dependent hypoxic response.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 29%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,117,173
of 6,561,235 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#555
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,380
of 150,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,561,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.