↓ Skip to main content

The B6 database: a tool for the description and classification of vitamin B6-dependent enzymatic activities and of the corresponding protein families

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The B6 database: a tool for the description and classification of vitamin B6-dependent enzymatic activities and of the corresponding protein families
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-10-273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Percudani, Alessio Peracchi

Abstract

Enzymes that depend on vitamin B6 (and in particular on its metabolically active form, pyridoxal 5'-phosphate, PLP) are of great relevance to biology and medicine, as they catalyze a wide variety of biochemical reactions mainly involving amino acid substrates. Although PLP-dependent enzymes belong to a small number of independent evolutionary lineages, they encompass more than 160 distinct catalytic functions, thus representing a striking example of divergent evolution. The importance and remarkable versatility of these enzymes, as well as the difficulties in their functional classification, create a need for an integrated source of information about them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 26%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 47 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 20%
Chemistry 37 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 54 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,306
of 7,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,543
of 91,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#43
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.