↓ Skip to main content

Short term treatment versus long term management of neck and back disability in older adults utilizing spinal manipulative therapy and supervised exercise: a parallel-group randomized clinical trial…

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short term treatment versus long term management of neck and back disability in older adults utilizing spinal manipulative therapy and supervised exercise: a parallel-group randomized clinical trial evaluating relative effectiveness and harms
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12998-014-0026-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corrie Vihstadt, Michele Maiers, Kristine Westrom, Gert Bronfort, Roni Evans, Jan Hartvigsen, Craig Schulz

Abstract

Back and neck disability are frequent in older adults resulting in loss of function and independence. Exercise therapy and manual therapy, like spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), have evidence of short and intermediate term effectiveness for spinal disability in the general population and growing evidence in older adults. For older populations experiencing chronic spinal conditions, long term management may be more appropriate to maintain improvement and minimize the impact of future exacerbations. Research is limited comparing short courses of treatment to long term management of spinal disability. The primary aim is to compare the relative effectiveness of 12 weeks versus 36 weeks of SMT and supervised rehabilitative exercise (SRE) in older adults with back and neck disability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 230 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 70 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 18%
Psychology 16 7%
Sports and Recreations 11 5%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 79 34%