↓ Skip to main content

Retraining and assessing hand movement after stroke using the MusicGlove: comparison with conventional hand therapy and isometric grip training

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,423)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
607 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraining and assessing hand movement after stroke using the MusicGlove: comparison with conventional hand therapy and isometric grip training
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nizan Friedman, Vicky Chan, Andrea N Reinkensmeyer, Ariel Beroukhim, Gregory J Zambrano, Mark Bachman, David J Reinkensmeyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 607 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 592 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 14%
Student > Bachelor 83 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 12%
Researcher 51 8%
Professor 24 4%
Other 93 15%
Unknown 200 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 88 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 80 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 9%
Neuroscience 35 6%
Computer Science 24 4%
Other 107 18%
Unknown 219 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#954,482
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#27
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,017
of 243,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.