↓ Skip to main content

DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
759 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
730 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordana T Bell, Athma A Pai, Joseph K Pickrell, Daniel J Gaffney, Roger Pique-Regi, Jacob F Degner, Yoav Gilad, Jonathan K Pritchard

Abstract

DNA methylation is an essential epigenetic mechanism involved in gene regulation and disease, but little is known about the mechanisms underlying inter-individual variation in methylation profiles. Here we measured methylation levels at 22,290 CpG dinucleotides in lymphoblastoid cell lines from 77 HapMap Yoruba individuals, for which genome-wide gene expression and genotype data were also available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 730 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 28 4%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Uruguay 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 666 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 236 32%
Researcher 166 23%
Student > Master 64 9%
Student > Bachelor 49 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 45 6%
Other 109 15%
Unknown 61 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 321 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 153 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 10%
Computer Science 32 4%
Mathematics 12 2%
Other 58 8%
Unknown 83 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,722,242
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,406
of 4,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,165
of 194,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.