↓ Skip to main content

Neutrophils with myeloid derived suppressor function deplete arginine and constrain T cell function in septic shock patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutrophils with myeloid derived suppressor function deplete arginine and constrain T cell function in septic shock patients
Published in
Critical Care, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/cc14003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christabelle J Darcy, Gabriela Minigo, Kim A Piera, Joshua S Davis, Yvette R McNeil, Youwei Chen, Alicia D Volkheimer, J Brice Weinberg, Nicholas M Anstey, Tonia Woodberry

Abstract

Impaired T cell function in sepsis is associated with poor outcome, but the mechanisms are unclear. In cancer, arginase-expressing myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) deplete arginine, impair T cell receptor CD3 zeta-chain expression and T cell function and are linked to poor clinical outcome, but their role during acute human infectious disease and in particular sepsis remains unknown. Hypoarginemia is prevalent in sepsis. This study aimed to determine whether neutrophils that co-purify with PBMC express arginase, and if arginine depletion constrains T cell CD3 zeta-chain expression and function in human sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,202,446
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,616
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,885
of 240,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#32
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.