↓ Skip to main content

Fatty acid status and behavioural symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in adolescents: A case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fatty acid status and behavioural symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in adolescents: A case-control study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-7-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley L Colter, Caroline Cutler, Kelly Anne Meckling

Abstract

Most studies of Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have focused on either young children or older adults. The current study compared 11 ADHD adolescents with 12 age-matched controls. The purpose was to examine differences in dietary intake, particularly of essential fatty acids, and determine whether this could explain the typical abnormalities in red blood cell fatty acids observed in previous studies of young children. A secondary purpose was to determine if there were relationships between circulating concentrations of essential fatty acids and specific ADHD behaviours as measured by the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-L).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Sweden 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 43 24%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 27%
Psychology 25 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,506,995
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#744
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,055
of 158,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.