You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How does burnout affect physician productivity? A systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn S Dewa, Desmond Loong, Sarah Bonato, Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Philip Jacobs |
| Abstract |
Interest in the well-being of physicians has increased because of their contributions to the healthcare system quality. There is growing recognition that physicians are exposed to workplace factors that increase the risk of work stress. Long-term exposure to high work stress can result in burnout. Reports from around the world suggest that about one-third to one-half of physicians experience burnout. Understanding the outcomes associated with burnout is critical to understanding its affects on the healthcare system. Productivity outcomes are among those that could have the most immediate effect on the healthcare system. This systematic literature review is one of the first to explore the evidence for the types of physician productivity outcomes associated with physician burnout. It answers the question, "How does burnout affect physician productivity?" |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 63% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Colombia | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 748 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 741 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 122 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 10% |
| Researcher | 70 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 8% |
| Other | 192 | 26% |
| Unknown | 169 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 269 | 36% |
| Psychology | 87 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 83 | 11% |
| Unknown | 200 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#785,755
of 24,307,517 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#181
of 8,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,739
of 233,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#5
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,307,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.