↓ Skip to main content

The Unculturables: targeted isolation of bacterial species associated with canine periodontal health or disease from dental plaque

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Unculturables: targeted isolation of bacterial species associated with canine periodontal health or disease from dental plaque
Published in
BMC Microbiology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-14-196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian J Davis, Christopher Bull, Alexander Horsfall, Ian Morley, Stephen Harris

Abstract

The current inability to culture the entirety of observed bacteria is well known and with the advent of ever more powerful molecular tools, that can survey bacterial communities at previously unattainable depth, the gap in our capacity to culture and define all of these species increases exponentially. This gap has essentially become the rate limiting step in determining how the knowledge of which species are present in a sample can be applied to understand the role of these species in an ecosystem or disease process. A case in point is periodontal disease, which is the most widespread oral disease in dogs. If untreated the disease results in significant pain, eventual loss of the dentition and potentially an increased risk of systemic diseases. Previous molecular based studies have identified the bacterial species associated with periodontal disease in dogs; however without cultured strains from many of these species it has not been possible to study whether they play a role in the disease process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,589
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,669
of 240,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.