↓ Skip to main content

Interobserver reliability of echocardiography for prognostication of normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interobserver reliability of echocardiography for prognostication of normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1476-7120-12-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dita Kopecna, Sem Briongos, Hugo Castillo, Carlos Moreno, Mónica Recio, Paula Navas, José Luis Lobo, Angel Alonso-Gomez, Izaskun Obieta-Fresnedo, Covadonga Fernández-Golfin, José Luis Zamorano, David Jiménez, for the PROTECT investigators

Abstract

To evaluate the interobserver reliability of echocardiographic findings of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction for prognosticating normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 22%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,608,967
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#105
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,696
of 229,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.