↓ Skip to main content

Disturbances of apoptotic cell clearance in systemic lupus erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disturbances of apoptotic cell clearance in systemic lupus erythematosus
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/ar3206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Hai Shao, Philip L Cohen

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multifactorial autoimmune disease with an as yet unknown etiopathogenesis. It is widely thought that self-immunization in systemic lupus is driven by defective clearance of dead and dying cells. In lupus patients, large numbers of apoptotic cells accumulate in various tissues including germinal centers. In the present review, we discuss the danger signals released by apoptotic cells, their triggering of inflammatory responses, and the breakdown of B-cell tolerance. We also review the pathogenic role of apoptotic cell clearance in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Sweden 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 25 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,803,281
of 11,809,779 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#615
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,751
of 191,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,809,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.