You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of functional fiber on postprandial glycemia, energy intake, satiety, palatability and gastrointestinal wellbeing: a randomized crossover trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-76 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jannie Yi Fang Yuan, Rebecca Jane Mason Smeele, Kate Daisy Harington, Fiona Maria van Loon, Anne Jacoba Wanders, Bernard Joseph Venn |
| Abstract |
Fiber intakes in developed countries are generally below those recommended by relevant authorities. Given that many people consume fiber-depleted refined-grain products, adding functional fiber will help to increase fiber intakes. The objective of the study was to determine metabolic and sensory effects of adding fiber to bread. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,006,038
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#628
of 1,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,966
of 239,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.