↓ Skip to main content

The effects of functional fiber on postprandial glycemia, energy intake, satiety, palatability and gastrointestinal wellbeing: a randomized crossover trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of functional fiber on postprandial glycemia, energy intake, satiety, palatability and gastrointestinal wellbeing: a randomized crossover trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jannie Yi Fang Yuan, Rebecca Jane Mason Smeele, Kate Daisy Harington, Fiona Maria van Loon, Anne Jacoba Wanders, Bernard Joseph Venn

Abstract

Fiber intakes in developed countries are generally below those recommended by relevant authorities. Given that many people consume fiber-depleted refined-grain products, adding functional fiber will help to increase fiber intakes. The objective of the study was to determine metabolic and sensory effects of adding fiber to bread.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#494,791
of 4,507,652 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#267
of 729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,329
of 110,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#17
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.