↓ Skip to main content

Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-6-102
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Nadine Wathen, Shannon L Sibbald, Susan M Jack, Harriet L MacMillan

Abstract

Violence against women (VAW) is a major public health problem. Translation of VAW research to policy and practice is an area that remains understudied, but provides the opportunity to examine knowledge translation and exchange (KTE) processes in a complex, multi-stakeholder context. In a series of studies including two randomized trials, the McMaster University VAW Research Program studied one key research gap: evidence about the effectiveness of screening women for exposure to intimate partner violence. This project developed and evaluated KTE strategies to share research findings with policymakers, health and community service providers, and women's advocates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 128 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 22 17%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Psychology 10 8%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 24 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,074,148
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#823
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,220
of 125,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.