You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Talk, trust and time: a longitudinal study evaluating knowledge translation and exchange processes for research on violence against women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C Nadine Wathen, Shannon L Sibbald, Susan M Jack, Harriet L MacMillan |
| Abstract |
Violence against women (VAW) is a major public health problem. Translation of VAW research to policy and practice is an area that remains understudied, but provides the opportunity to examine knowledge translation and exchange (KTE) processes in a complex, multi-stakeholder context. In a series of studies including two randomized trials, the McMaster University VAW Research Program studied one key research gap: evidence about the effectiveness of screening women for exposure to intimate partner violence. This project developed and evaluated KTE strategies to share research findings with policymakers, health and community service providers, and women's advocates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,299,028
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#828
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,834
of 127,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.