You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of timing of protein and carbohydrate intake after resistance exercise on nitrogen balance in trained and untrained young men
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1880-6805-33-24 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiroyasu Mori |
Abstract |
Resistance exercise alters the post-exercise response of anabolic and catabolic hormones. A previous study indicated that the turnover of muscle protein in trained individuals is reduced due to alterations in endocrine factors caused by resistance training, and that muscle protein accumulation varies between trained and untrained individuals due to differences in the timing of protein and carbohydrate intake. We investigated the effect of the timing of protein and carbohydrate intake after resistance exercise on nitrogen balance in trained and untrained young men. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 13 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 24 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 26% |
Scientists | 6 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 25% |
Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 27 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#192,413
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#10
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,571
of 241,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.