↓ Skip to main content

Effect of timing of protein and carbohydrate intake after resistance exercise on nitrogen balance in trained and untrained young men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of timing of protein and carbohydrate intake after resistance exercise on nitrogen balance in trained and untrained young men
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1880-6805-33-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroyasu Mori

Abstract

Resistance exercise alters the post-exercise response of anabolic and catabolic hormones. A previous study indicated that the turnover of muscle protein in trained individuals is reduced due to alterations in endocrine factors caused by resistance training, and that muscle protein accumulation varies between trained and untrained individuals due to differences in the timing of protein and carbohydrate intake. We investigated the effect of the timing of protein and carbohydrate intake after resistance exercise on nitrogen balance in trained and untrained young men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 25%
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 27 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#192,413
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#10
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,571
of 241,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.