↓ Skip to main content

RNase H-dependent PCR (rhPCR): improved specificity and single nucleotide polymorphism detection using blocked cleavable primers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
27 patents
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNase H-dependent PCR (rhPCR): improved specificity and single nucleotide polymorphism detection using blocked cleavable primers
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-11-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph R Dobosy, Scott D Rose, Kristin R Beltz, Susan M Rupp, Kristy M Powers, Mark A Behlke, Joseph A Walder

Abstract

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used to detect the presence of nucleic acid sequences both in research and diagnostic settings. While high specificity is often achieved, biological requirements sometimes necessitate that primers are placed in suboptimal locations which lead to problems with the formation of primer dimers and/or misamplification of homologous sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 222 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 30%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 13 6%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Chemistry 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 49 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,636,069
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#62
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,539
of 134,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.