You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of L-carnitine supplementation on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bor-Jen Lee, Jun-Shuo Lin, Yi-Chin Lin, Ping-Ting Lin |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Higher oxidative stress may contribute to the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of L-carnitine (LC, 1000 mg/d) on the markers of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities in CAD patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Fiji | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,294,914
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#744
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,804
of 241,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.