You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of telehealth on glycaemic control: analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes in the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-334 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Steventon, Martin Bardsley, Helen Doll, Elizabeth Tuckey, Stanton P Newman |
| Abstract |
The Whole Systems Demonstrator was a large, pragmatic, cluster randomised trial that compared telehealth with usual care among 3,230 patients with long-term conditions in three areas of England. Telehealth involved the regular transmission of physiological information such as blood glucose to health professionals working remotely. We examined whether telehealth led to changes in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) among the subset of patients with type 2 diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,934,211
of 24,337,175 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#707
of 8,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,655
of 234,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#11
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,337,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.