↓ Skip to main content

The clustering of health behaviours in Ireland and their relationship with mental health, self-rated health and quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clustering of health behaviours in Ireland and their relationship with mental health, self-rated health and quality of life
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary C Conry, Karen Morgan, Philip Curry, Hannah McGee, Janas Harrington, Mark Ward, Emer Shelley

Abstract

Health behaviours do not occur in isolation. Rather they cluster together. It is important to examine patterns of health behaviours to inform a more holistic approach to health in both health promotion and illness prevention strategies. Examination of patterns is also important because of the increased risk of mortality, morbidity and synergistic effects of health behaviours. This study examines the clustering of health behaviours in a nationally representative sample of Irish adults and explores the association of these clusters with mental health, self-rated health and quality of life.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 283 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 68 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 19%
Psychology 34 12%
Social Sciences 33 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,261,840
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,550
of 15,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,941
of 128,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#26
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.