↓ Skip to main content

A novel cost effective and high-throughput isolation and identification method for marine microalgae

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel cost effective and high-throughput isolation and identification method for marine microalgae
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-10-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin T Jahn, Katrin Schmidt, Thomas Mock

Abstract

Marine microalgae are of major ecologic and emerging economic importance. Biotechnological screening schemes of microalgae for specific traits and laboratory experiments to advance our knowledge on algal biology and evolution strongly benefit from culture collections reflecting a maximum of the natural inter- and intraspecific diversity. However, standard procedures for strain isolation and identification, namely DNA extraction, purification, amplification, sequencing and taxonomic identification still include considerable constraints increasing the time required to establish new cultures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Environmental Science 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 12 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,124,633
of 21,001,073 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#369
of 994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,886
of 208,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,001,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them