↓ Skip to main content

Left ventricular shape variation in asymptomatic populations: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Left ventricular shape variation in asymptomatic populations: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12968-014-0056-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pau Medrano-Gracia, Brett R Cowan, Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh, David A Bluemke, John Eng, John Paul Finn, Carissa G Fonseca, Joao AC Lima, Avan Suinesiaputra, Alistair A Young

Abstract

Although left ventricular cardiac geometric indices such as size and sphericity characterize adverse remodeling and have prognostic value in symptomatic patients, little is known of shape distributions in subclinical populations. We sought to quantify shape variation across a large number of asymptomatic volunteers, and examine differences among sub-cohorts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Engineering 25 21%
Computer Science 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,409,565
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#365
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,899
of 240,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.