You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health systems research in the time of health system reform in India: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krishna D Rao, Radhika Arora, Abdul Ghaffar |
| Abstract |
Research on health systems is an important contributor to improving health system performance. Importantly, research on program and policy implementation can also create a culture of public accountability. In the last decade, significant health system reforms have been implemented in India. These include strengthening the public sector health system through the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), and expansion of government-sponsored insurance schemes for the poor. This paper provides a situation analysis of health systems research during the reform period. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,128,301
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#670
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,803
of 237,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.